米兰vs拉齐奥终场前点球未判原因：马鲁西奇对帕夫洛维奇犯规（米兰战拉齐奥补时争议点球未判：因马鲁西奇先对帕夫洛维奇犯规）

Clarifying user intent

The user's statement is a bit ambiguous. They provided a headline but didn’t ask a direct question, so they might want a summary or an expanded explanation. I should consider asking for clarification. While I can run specific commands in Codex CLI according to the harness guidelines, this situation seems more about providing a sports explanation rather than executing a simple command. I should avoid making assumptions and could explain the VAR process in general about foul situations instead.Explaining penalty rationale

I need to explain why there's no penalty in this situation. If there was an earlier foul by the attacking team, it cancels any potential penalty. I should consider scenarios like a stoppage-time incident and how the defender's actions might overshadow the play. According to IFAB Laws, if the attacker committed a foul first, and VAR confirms that, the restart will be a defensive free kick instead of a penalty. I can clarify this reasoning and ask if they need specific clips or timestamps for further understanding.Providing penalty explanation in Chinese

I need to keep in mind that if this situation occurred during stoppage time, it might often be missed. I’ll respond in Chinese, following the user’s language. I should lay out key points: 1) Prior foul sequence takes precedence; 2) VAR intervention process; 3) Consequences of the call: defensive free kick and potential yellow card; 4) Why it may seem like a missed penalty. I can also ask if they want a frame-by-frame breakdown if they have a clip and offer to analyze it if they send a GIF or video.